When you were born, you signed an valisnbie contract, saying that you agree to be a 2nd class citizen, your whole life.You are not a citizen of your state, you are a Federal Citizen.Good luck trying to keep them from putting a chip in an ID card, your mandated to get.

7no6a3 enlpurjiiuju

auto owners insurance rlg car insurance in florida kfgd

that McCain is “natural-born.”He also said that even if a candidate does not meet the constitutional qualifications to be president, he or she should still be on the ballot.Every time a minor party presidential candidate who does not meet the constitutional qualifications to be president tries to get on the ballot, and the matter goes to court, courts rule that the candidate should not be on the ballot.The two leading cases are Cleaver v Jordan, in which the California Supreme Court said that Eldridge Cleaver should not be on the 1968 California ballot, and Jenness v Brown, in which a U.S. District Court in Ohio said that Linda Jenness (Socialist Workers Party presidential candidate in 1972) should not be on the ballot. Both Cleaver and Jenness were under age 35. Unfortunately, neither decision is reported, although the briefs in Robinson v Bowen cited the Cleaver case.Judge Alsup wrote, “Mechanisms exist under the Twelfth Amendment and 3 U.S.C. 15 for any challenge to any candidate to be ventilated when electoral votes are counted, and the Twentieth Amendment provides guidance regarding how to proceed if a president elect shall have failed to qualify. Issues regarding qualifications or lack thereof can be laid before the voting public before the election and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in Congress. Therefore, this order holds that the challenge presented by plaintiff is committed under the Constitution to the electors and the legislative branch, at least in the first instance. Judicial review (if any) should occur only after the electoral and Congressional processes have run their course.”The party that most often nominates a presidential candidate, or a vice-presidential candidate, who does not meet the Constitutional qualifications, is the Socialist Workers Party, which has done this in 1972, 1980, 2004, and 2008. Each time the party used a stand-in who did meet the Constitutional qualifications (but only in those states which refuse to print an unqualified presidential candidate on the ballot).Each time except 1972, the party did not fight in court to place its actual nominee on the ballot. Perhaps, if the SWP or any other party nominates someone in 2012 who doesn’t meet the Constitutional qualifications, the party can raise the issue in court again, this time depending on the Robinson v McCain precedent.

over the counter viagra buy propecia

to Parliament in 1653. Can someone please go scream this through the halls of Congress? Both parties. Both houses.“It is high time for me to put an end to your sitting in this place, which you have dishonoured by your contempt of all virtue, and defiled by your practice of every vice; ye are a factious crew, and enemies to all good government; ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would like Esau sell your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas betray your God for a few pieces of money; is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you? is there one vice you do not possess? Ye have no more religion than my horse; gold is your God; which of you have not barter’d your conscience for bribes? Is there a man amongst you that has the least care for the good of the Commonwealth? Ye sordid prostitutes have you not defil’d this sacred place, and turn’d the Lord’s temple into a den of thieves, by your immoral principles and wicked practices? Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation; you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redress’d, are yourselves become the greatest grievance. Your country therefore calls upon me to cleanse this Augean stable, by putting a final period to your iniquitous proceedings in this House; and which by God’s help, and the strength he has given me, I am now come to do; I command ye therefore, upon the peril of your lives, to depart immediately out of this place; go, get you out! Make haste! Ye venal slaves be gone! So! Take away that shining bauble there (Parliamentary Staff), and lock up the doors. In the name of God, go!”

car insurance auto insurance quotes

So eloquent and thoughtful…Mindsets like yours, in which employers feel entitled (compelled even) to “make (their) profit regardless,” are a significant factor in the paradigm we want to change. We also want to challenge many of the basic assumptions of economics, including the circular reasoning that is the concept of profit maximization. It is not a necessary outcome that paying your workers a living wage – what ultimately amounts to taking an interest in the success and well-being of your community – will result in higher prices and less employment. If you aren’t a savvy enough businessperson to figure out a way to balance your basic income needs with affordable prices and reasonable wages, while complying with a fair and coherent regulatory scheme, maybe you should be an employee as opposed to an employer.Also, the term you use – ‘basic economics’ – is essentially meaningless. You use it as a scientist would use the term ‘basic physics,’ but economics is not a pure science. In our society, it’s more akin to a religion. When you say ‘basic economics,’ you’re almost certainly referring to the free market economics model worshiped in the business programs of most Western institutions of higher learning (although I’m sensing some sort of online degree from you). That model is normative, not descriptive, and it is only due to greed, selfishness, and moral and intellectual laziness that it has managed to thrive thus far. Believe it or not, there are alternative economic models that don’t begin with the assumption that personal profit and economic growth are the only measures of value. Once we start teaching those models in our business schools, employers like yourself will become the rarity.

car insurance auto insurance

Challenge, can anyone prove this wrong?:– 1. Constitution Article II requires USA President to be “natural born citizen”. 2. BHO’s website admits his dad was Kenyan/British, not American, citizen when BHO was born.3. BHO is therefore not a “natural born citizen” (irrespective of Hawaiian birth or whether he may be a 14th Amendment “citizen” of USA) — as confirmed in the Senate’s own McCain qualification resolution agreed to by BHO.4. Supreme Court has already docketed two upcoming conferences, 1/9/09 and 1/16/09 — between dates Congress counts electoral votes (1/8/09) and Presidential inauguration (1/20/09) — to address Berg Case and fashion relief on BHO’s eligibility to be President.5. Since no facts are in dispute, Supreme Court rules on Summary Judgment to enjoin BHO’s inauguration as President.6. Therefore, BHO is not inaugurated as President.7. Vice President Elect Biden is inaugurated Acting President under the 20th Amendment to serve until new President is determined — the procedure for which determination to be set out by Congress and/or the Supreme Court so long as in conformance with the Constitution.

car insurance buy auto insurance online

auto insurance 524582 health insurance plans lbw viagra 095688

buy cialis generic 50658 car insurance in florida 5220 viagra =-((( cialis yzus

auto insurance quotes %-P new jersey car insurance =D car insurance quotes 314 cheap car insurance :-PPP

cheap auto insurance zjuc cheap car insurance >:] car insurance 49670

cialis - cialis online - http://buycialisonlinecheapdhk.com/ cialis - cialis 20mg - http://cialis20mgcialisdailydfh.com/ buy cialis - cialis online - http://buycialisonlinegenericdfh.com/ cheap cialis - cheap cialis - http://cialispricecheapcialisefh.com/ cialis professional - cialis professional - http://cialisreviewscialisprofessionalghk.com/

Cruzin World Automotive Jewelry and Car Show DVDs




Security Code*:
security image


Comments at MuscleCarsOfAmerica.com